The best known moral dilemma created by Kohlberg is the “Heinz” dilemma, which discusses the idea of obeying the law versus saving a life. Kohlberg emphasized that it is the way an individual reasons about a dilemma that determines positive moral development.
Likewise, people ask, what purpose was served by Lawrence Kohlberg’s Heinz dilemma?
The purpose of the Heinz Dilemma is to identify what stage of moral development an individual is currently in. This is concluded by the type of rationale that is used in justifying one’s belief about why Heinz should or should not have stolen the medicine for his wife.
One may also ask, what is Kohlberg’s dilemma? The Heinz dilemma is a frequently used example in many ethics and morality classes. One well-known version of the dilemma, used in Lawrence Kohlberg‘s stages of moral development, is stated as follows: A woman was on her deathbed. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her.
how is Stage 2 of Kohlberg’s theory different from stage1?
It seems fairly clear that Kohlberg’s stages are qualitatively different from one another. For example, stage 1 responses, which focus on obedience to authority, sound very different from stage 2 responses, which argue that each person is free to behave as he or she wishes.
What are the criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory?
A critique of Kohlberg’s theory is that it emphasizes justice to the exclusion of other values and so may not adequately address the arguments of those who value other moral aspects of actions. Carol Gilligan has argued that Kohlberg’s theory is excessively androcentric.