The Webster–Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.
What is the significance of the Webster Hayne debate?
A crucial senatorial debate on the question of the states’ relationship to the federal government. A crucial senatorial debate on the question of the states’ relationship to the federal government. Two generations after the founding, Americans still disagreed on the nature of the Union.
What did the Webster Hayne debate start over? Observers then and since have considered Massachusetts senator Daniel Webster’s closing oration, beginning on January 26, 1830, as the most famous speech in Senate history. The debate began with a proposal by a Connecticut senator to limit federal land sales in the West.
What was the Webster Hayne debate quizlet?
The Webster-Hayne debate was between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina, 1830 regarding protectionist tariffs. … Hayne of South Carolina, 1830 regarding protectionist tariffs. Calhoun, was a proponent of protective tariffs; later, he was a proponent of free trade.
What did Hayne argue?
Hamilton and Hayne argued that states could “nullify” federal laws with which they did not agree. Eighty percent of its 162 delegates voted to nullify federal tariffs of 1828 and 1832, and for the Ordinance of Nullification. A temporary compromise was reached between the federal government and South Carolina in 1833.
Where did the Webster Hayne debate happen?
The Webster–Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.
How did President Jackson react to the Hayne Webster debate of 1830?
Jackson’s Response: Hayne stood in support of states rights. He said that being able to declare a law unjust gave the states a way to legally protest federal legislation. Even though Andrew Jackson was very strongly against nullification, he was worried about the economic condition of the southern states.
When a state refuses to follow a federal law it is called?
Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal laws which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state’s own constitution).
Who was right in the Nullification controversy?
In response to the Tariff of 1828, vice president John C. Calhoun asserted that states had the right to nullify federal laws.
What was Daniel Webster’s position during the Webster Hayne 1830 debate?
In Webster’s reply to Hayne, he argued that the southern states secede since the Constitution applies to both the North and the South. This debate brought into question the limits of what the federal government could do. Webster’s reply to Hayne revealed his sense of federalism.
What were the causes and consequences of the Webster Hayne debate?
The Senate debates between Whig Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Democrat Senator Robert Y. … Webster argued that the American people had created the Union to promote the good of the whole. Hayne argued that the sovereign and independent states had created the Union to promote their particular interests.
What was the Webster Hayne debate Apush?
An argument between Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne, about the issue states’ rights versus national power. Webster said that Hayne was a challenge to the integrity of the Union. Hayne responded with a defense of the theory of nullification.
What factor united all members of the new Whig Party?
The one thing that united all members of the new Whig party was opposition to: a money backed by gold and silver.
Who gave the greatest debate of the Nullification crisis?
The 1828 tariff led John C. Calhoun to assert the right of states to nullify unpopular laws, borrowing arguments from the 1798 Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson and from New England’s opposition to the Embargo Act of 1807.
What were Webster’s viewpoints over state and national law?
In Webster’s view, the fundamental question was: “Whose prerogative is it to decide on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of the laws?” He held that the Constitution of the United States “confers on the Government itself, to be exercised by its appropriate Department, and under its responsibility to the …
What did it mean to nullify the tariff?
The nullification crisis was a conflict between the U.S. state of South Carolina and the federal government of the United States in 1832–33. … In November 1832 South Carolina adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state.